The prospect of Donald Trump joining the ranks of Mount Rushmore’s legendary figures has stirred up a mix of intrigue and skepticism. Would his inclusion be a fitting tribute to a groundbreaking presidency, or merely a stretch too far for a polarizing leader? As the conversation gains steam, let’s explore what makes this idea so contentious.
Talk of adding Trump to Mount Rushmore dates back to his presidency, where he humorously endorsed the notion in 2020. Now, Florida Representative Anna Paulina Luna has taken the idea further by introducing legislation to make it happen. Her argument centers on Trump’s perceived successes, including his economic policies and judicial appointments. Supporters view him as a leader who embodied the spirit of “making America great” and reshaping the political landscape. With influential figures like Doug Burgum, the Secretary of the Interior, possibly lending support, the proposal has found a foothold among Trump enthusiasts.
I’ve officially introduced legislation to put President Trump’s face on Mount Rushmore.
His remarkable accomplishments for our country and the success he will continue to deliver deserve the highest recognition and honor on this iconic national monument. Let’s get carving! pic.twitter.com/vfFuebuS7F
— Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (@RepLuna) January 28, 2025
Yet, turning this vision into reality presents numerous challenges. Mount Rushmore, a tribute to four monumental presidents, stands as a testament to American history. Altering it would demand congressional approval, triggering a wave of legal and ethical questions. Additionally, experts say the mountain lacks the necessary rock stability for another carving, rendering the project technically difficult. And then there’s the public reaction—Trump’s controversial legacy guarantees a fiery national debate.
Proponents insist that Trump’s presidency was transformative enough to earn him a place. They cite his economic growth strategies, trade deals, and focus on border security as key achievements. Detractors, however, highlight moments like the Capitol riot and his impeachment trials as disqualifiers. Many preservationists argue that Mount Rushmore should remain untouched, preserving its integrity as a historic monument.
For now, the idea appears to be more symbolic than practical. Without tangible steps toward implementation, it’s unlikely to materialize anytime soon. Still, the mere suggestion reflects Trump’s continued dominance in political conversations, ensuring his presence looms large—even if not literally on Mount Rushmore.
