Imane Khelif, Algeria’s Olympic boxing champion, has been suspended from Women’s World Boxing events after refusing to comply with new genetic testing requirements. The controversial policy, designed to ensure fair competition, has drawn backlash for its impact on athletes like Khelif, who has faced gender scrutiny throughout her career.
Khelif’s gold medal in Paris was a triumph, but it also fueled debate. Critics pointed to her rapid victories—including a 46-second win—as evidence of an alleged biological edge. Last year, the IBA barred her from the Women’s World Championships, citing chromosome tests. Though the IOC overruled the decision, allowing her to compete in the Olympics, the stigma remained.
“I am a woman,” Khelif insisted in an emotional interview. “Being doubted like this is painful and unfair.” Despite her defiance, World Boxing’s new rules demand genetic proof of eligibility, leaving her sidelined.
The policy requires athletes to prove they lack a Y chromosome, a move supporters argue maintains fairness. However, opponents say it disregards intersex athletes and violates privacy. Khelif’s legal team is exploring challenges under EU data protection laws, claiming the rule is vague and discriminatory.
With her career in limbo, Khelif’s case highlights the tension between inclusion and competitive integrity. As sports organizations grapple with these complex issues, her fight extends beyond the ring—into a broader battle over identity and equality in athletics.
